Blogs

Our blog features insights from John R. Stoker and other thought leaders on a variety of topics related to dialogue, culture change, teamwork, performance management, critical thinking, and leadership.
If you have a pressing communication challenge that you would like to feature, email us at help@dialogueworks.com. We would be happy to address your questions in a fun and timely manner.
Stay current with an RSS feed!
The DialogueWORKS blog is regularly updated with new postings. Subscribing to our blog allows you to access the blog by receiving automatic updates of new posts. Click the RSS icon to subscribe to our blog and stay current on what we’re thinking.
Why Are Some People Always Angry?February 14th, 2012 |
|
|
Q: I have a manager who is always angry. She gets angry when I do as she has asked. She gets angry when I don’t do as she has asked. It seems like she is always angry at everyone all the time. Everyone on our team goes to great lengths to avoid her. In fact, the first thing we do every morning is assess the level of her irritation before the day gets under way. Why are some people always angry, and is there anything you recommend that would help the situation?
A: Let’s take a moment to define “anger.” Anger is an emotion that usually arises because of an individual’s perceived loss. Their perceived loss results from something someone did that in their mind is unfair or unwarranted. What is so interesting about anger is that anger is a secondary emotion that serves to veil our more vulnerable emotions—what we feel first.
To state it more formally, our perception of loss creates our emotions either because of the way we interact with others or because of the way we perceive ourselves.
Interacting with Others The perception of loss we experience in dealing with others gives rise to five primary emotions. Primary emotions that might be expressed outwardly as anger are:
Let’s define each primary emotion and give you a verbal cue which may help you recognize which primary emotion is behind the anger.
Frustration occurs because of violated expectations, broken promises, or commitments surrounding performance issues. You know that expectations are at issue when you hear, “Your failure to meet the deadline cost us the contract.”
Embarrassment results from an attack on someone’s person. Such an attack is made worse if it is made in front of others. You will know an attack has occurred if you hear, “She actually insulted me in front of the entire team.”
Disappointment arises from the loss of an anticipated gain. When anticipation collides unhappily with reality, you might hear, “After we responded to all their nitpicky requests, you’re telling me that they still didn’t accept our proposal?”
Fear results when the actions of others threaten our security or safety. Safety is at issue when you hear the following: “That jerk nearly hit the front of our car and killed us!”
A feeling of Rejection may arise when someone says or does something that negates or invalidates the way we think or perform. For example, if a person values personal autonomy in doing their work, a value violation might sound like this: “It drives me crazy when he stands over my shoulder and constantly tells me what to do!”
Any time an individual feels frustrated, embarrassed, disappointed, afraid, or rejected, that primary emotion may look like anger. This display of anger emotion results because the individual perceives the loss of a value.
Perception of Self Sometimes, our perception of ourselves creates an emotion that is expressed by anger. I believe that sometimes leaders are actually angry at themselves when they are outwardly expressing hostile feelings. Maybe your manager is angry because she failed to foresee the challenges that would arise when she asked you to accomplish a task. Perhaps she’s angry because she failed to share her expectations clearly, and her lack of clarity showed up in your results. Unfortunately, you as the employee end up catching the brunt of her anger. You may even take her anger personally, as you interpret yourself to be at fault. In many cases, a manager’s blame takes the place of personal responsibility.
Before offering some strategies for dealing with anger, remember that anger is an emotion or Energy in motion. Because we all generate energy, we are also containers or vessels of energy—which we call emotion. We either fill up our vessels or we allow others to fill up our vessels for us.
We know that your manager is filled with the energy of emotion, but we don’t know if that emotion is being generated by her or if someone else is dumping it on her. What we can confidently say, however, is that her vessel is full and that she is dumping or spewing its contents—her anger—on everyone around her. Unfortunately, her emotional energy pushes people away; no one likes to be around a person who is “always angry.” Your manager’s emotional state keeps her from connecting with and understanding—and being understood by—others.
Here are some strategies you might try.
Don’t take it personally. Remember that a person’s emotion says more about them than it does about you. Why? Their emotion is product of a their perception. Recognize that there is something going on in the person’s head that is driving the emotion. That something is what you want to discover. Asking questions is a great way to begin.
Acknowledge their feelings. Acknowledging a person’s feelings has the effect of reducing the emotional energy they are displaying. Use any of the following phrases: “I can see you’re upset.” “I can see you have strong feelings about…” “I can see this means a lot to you.”
Ask questions to understand. After acknowledging a person’s feelings, follow up with an open-ended question. “I can see you’re upset (Emotion). What’s going on?”
Listen for what is wanted. If you ask enough questions, they should tell you their story. Embedded in their story is information about what they wanted and didn’t get—their values. Don’t hesitate to ask questions to clarify what they wanted if you are in doubt. Remember that when a person has a negative complaint, it is really their expression of a positive value.
Look for opportunities to affirm a person’s values. Once you know what is important to a person, don’t hesitate to sincerely affirm the person’s value. For example, if your manager really values serving your customers, you would look for an opportunity to say something like this:
“I also appreciate the importance of serving our customers well. Can we
Notice that once we affirmed their value, we shifted the conversation to addressing the current challenge. This focuses the conversation on making vital improvements.
Look for opportunities to share appreciation. Look for opportunities to recognize what your manager does well and recognize that gossiping and complaining about her conduct behind her back does not help the situation. Engaging in that type of behavior generates an energy all its own that your manager picks up on, and it will often make the situation worse.
Dealing with emotion is a fascinating topic. I hope you recognize that a person’s outward emotion—anger—is really a signal of a person’s perception of loss. The challenge is to defuse the emotion, identify their perceived loss, and create a plan of action to address the challenge. In other words, the challenge is to find a way to work together effectively.
Best of luck! |
|
| View Comments |
Handling a CriticizerJanuary 17th, 2012 |
|
|
A: Unfortunately this is a common occurrence on many teams. Failing to address the situation will continue to impact collaboration and erode teamwork, and may even work to undermine your creditability as the team leader. Bottom line—such individuals can hinder the success of the team.
Before I offer some suggestions, notice the impact this individual’s behavior is having on respect, relationships, and results. It is almost certain that the rest of the team does not respect him, and his comments may even lead to lack of respect for the person he is criticizing. It is likely that people avoid being in relationship with him because of what it might cost them: “If he would attack her, he might attack me.” I bet that the other team members probably avoid dealing with him whenever possible. Finally, his behavior is impeding the desired results because of its impact on the group’s dynamics. Here are some actions that you need to take immediately.
Check Your Group Ground Rules In order to hold effective team meetings, you and your team need to create a list of rules that govern the conduct of the team. These rules should address such issues as meeting times, agendas, talking turns, decision-making and problem-solving strategies, and individual behavior. Everyone should participate in creating these ground rules and everyone should agree to them. Ground rules give everyone permission to hold the group accountable for individual misconduct.
Step Up and Speak Up Group ground rules should help everyone to step up and speak up. If they don’t, then you, as the team leader, must set the example. The challenge in this situation is in determining what you should do in the moment and what actions should be taken after the meeting is over. Say, for example, that an incident of bad behavior occurs during a meeting. In the moment, you will want to refocus the group’s attention and efforts on the task at hand. After the meeting is over, you will want to hold a private conversation with the individual who is causing problems.
Refocus the Group’s Attention When this individual attacks or criticizes someone, move the group’s attention off of the person and back onto the process. It might sound like this:
“I’d like to focus our attention on what happened from the perspective of improving how we’ll handle this situation differently in the future. Can we do that now?”
Notice that this statement ends in a question to increase the engagement of the group on that activity. In a respectful way, this signals to the individual and the group that criticism and belittling of an individual is inappropriate behavior in a team setting.
Hold the Tough Conversation In a private setting, you want to provide constructive feedback to the individual who attacked one of his teammates. You will want to use the DialogueWORKS Process for holding the conversation. (In fact, we highly recommend that you review the conversational recipe “Addressing Inappropriate Behavior” on our site.)
Focus the conversation on helping the offending individual recognize how his behavior is impacting the person he attacked as well as the rest of the group. Specifically point out the team’s response to his critical remark. He may not be particularly observant in recognizing the impact of his behavior on the group, so you must be prepared to offer specific data points or examples of what happened.
Don’t be surprised at this individual’s lack of awareness—most of us are challenged to see ourselves as we are seen. This particular teammate is likely oblivious to the impact his behavior is having. I recently had an event participant ask me if my hair was really real. Somewhat surprised, I assured them that it is (thankfully!).
Finally, you might also ask this individual to do some self-reflection about why he seemingly feels the need to engage in this type of attacking or critical behavior.
Sum it All Up To end your conversation, you need to explain that these outbursts or attacks are unacceptable and will not be tolerated in the future. Clearly lay out the consequences of noncompliance if there is not a change in how he interacts with his team members. Of course, this is easy to do if this person reports to you.
If he does not report to you, then this conversation will need to be about influencing him to take a more positive approach to add value to the team’s efforts. Help him to understand the value of his cooperation, contribution, and collaboration in achieving the team’s goals and objectives. Be clear that it is fine to critique or analyze processes, procedures, and outcomes, but that debasing or criticizing an individual is completely unacceptable.
Best wishes in speaking with Mr. Know-it-all. |
|
| View Comments |
The Gift of OurselvesDecember 21st, 2011 |
|
|
I was dashing through the Atlanta airport to catch a flight out West. When I finally arrived at my gate and had a moment to pause, I started to notice what was happening around me. People were hiding behind their newspapers, texting on their smartphones, or standing shoulder to shoulder like a mass of penguins. I was shocked by how few people were actually talking and connecting with those around them. I thought, “Certainly on Thanksgiving weekend, people would show a little more cheer.” Little did I know, I would soon have an opportunity to connect with another person. |
Late Again?!December 2nd, 2011 |
|||||||
|
Q: I am a Nurse Supervisor, and I frequently
A: First, you need to realize that if you don’t call people on their poor performance, being silent is the same as saying, “Whatever you’re doing is no big deal!” If you let current performance persist, you will continue to get the same result. To make matters worse, if this nurse continues to get away with what she is doing, her behavior sends the message that others have permission to do the same. Or even worse yet, other nurses will question your leadership because of your unwillingness to address the problem. Here are some suggestions to improve the situation.
Address the Issue You have to address individual performance with the individual. When you can take a moment, hold a conversation with the offending party in private.
Prepare Ahead of Time
Review the DialogueWORKS framework, identify the facts you will share and the interpretation youcare to test. For example, you may choose to begin with something like this: “I noticed that today and Friday you arrived between 8 and 9:30 a.m. (Facts.) I’m thinking that there are some challenging priorities you are facing. (Interpretation.) What is going on? (Question.)”
What is most important is that you offer a non-threatening space for people to talk about what is happening. Remember, “put-downs lead to shut-downs.” It is difficult to create a solution to a problem if the other person won’t engage or becomes defensive. Allowing the person to explain their side of the story helps you to know what you need to address specifically.
Share a Positive Interpretation When a person doesn’tperform as expected, we are often quick to assume the worst about their behavior—that they are lazy or inept, or both. You need to recognize that a person’s positive intent goes obscured by your negative assumptions or interpretations about their behavior. To identify a positive intent for a person’s behavior, you might find it helpful to assign a positive intent to the individual’s behavior. Use these questions to expand your thinking:
"What would explain such behavior in a positive light?" or “How might I interpret such behavior positively?” or “What positive intent would explain their behavior?”
Notice how you might suspend a negative assumption by assigning a positive assumption.
Notice the difference in tone that these positive assumptions deliver.
Don’t worry about creating a positive assumption that may not be true. What is important is that your delivery of the message is positive so that the conversation will continue. You will have the opportunity to establish increased accountability before you are through. What is important is that you move past your interpretation by asking questions that will increase your understanding.
Motivate with Consequences Many believe that people are more motivated by sharing negative consequences rather than positive consequences. The only time I have found sharing negative consequences to be useful is when you want to be perfectly clear about what negative consequences will follow from continuing poor performance. Otherwise, I have found sharing positive consequences and expectations to be more powerful. Notice the difference:
Negative Consequences “When you are late, everyone becomes frustrated and irritated because they have to do your work. They also worry about not providing adequate patient care.”
Positive Consequences “When you are here on time, everyone feels more like a team knowing they can count on one another to do their own work. We are also confident that our patients will receive the attention and care they need.”
Notice that framing the situation positively allows the individual to clearly understand how their behavior contributes to a specific, positive outcome.
Identify a Plan
Being able to successfully address individual performance issues, such as being late, will not only improve individual commitment but also increase productivity. Remember that individuals are more inspired by the value of their contribution rather than how their behavior detracts from the enterprise. The key is to hold a conversation that increases respect, builds the existing relationship, and achieves the desired results. |
|||||||
| View Comments | |||||||
"Outside" vs. "Inside" the ConversationOctober 14th, 2011 |
|
|
Q: Sometimes difficult situations arise unexpectedly and A: What a great question! Taking the time to prepare for a difficult conversation vastly increases the likelihood that the outcome will be positive. But as you realize, the real challenge of your skills occurs when you are confronted spontaneously with a challenging situation. Here are a few suggestions that will help you when you find yourself “inside” a challenging conversation.
Internalize the DialogueWORKS Framework
Right now, while you are still outside the conversation, internalize the process: Initiate, Discover, Connect, and Build. Know what happens in each phase of the model. Remember that in Initiation you share facts and interpretations, and in Discovery you ask questions to increase your understanding. In the Connection phase you summarize values and expectations. Then you finish the conversation in the Building phase, where you agree upon a plan and gain commitment. Once you have internalized this framework, you will always know where you are in the conversation and where you want to go next. Listen for the Facts Difficult conversations that occur unexpectedly often tend to begin with some kind of accusation: “You never get this right!” “I can’t count on you for anything!” “Are you just stupid or what?!” Notice that these criticisms, judgments, or inflammatory statements are all interpretations. The speaker has assigned some meaning—their own interpretation—to whatever facts actually exists. In order to resolve the situation, you will want to ask questions that uncover the facts. You might use questions like these: “Give me an example of…” “Tell me specifically what I did…” “Review for me….” Remember that you are listening for the facts. If you don’t hear facts, keep asking questions until you know what the other person observed or experienced and what has formed the basis of the judgment they are laying at your feet.
Reflect Emotion If the person is defensive or emotional, reflect their emotion and then follow with a question. For example: “I can see you’re upset (reflect). What is going on?” Remember that a person’s emotion masks or hides what is really going on in their head. When you reflect a person’s emotion back to them, it actually lessens their emotional state. In other words, they become less angry or upset. When the emotion itself subsides, it becomes possible to explore what is really at the heart of the issue.
Interestingly, studies have shown
Summarize What You Have Heard Once you believe that you have heard and comprehended what the person has said, summarize to them what you have understood. Don’t worry about being wrong; if you have misunderstood, the person will likely correct you, and they will appreciate the attempt you are making to clearly understand their perspective.
Build a Plan Once you have reached the point where you both understand the issue, work together to create a plan that will fix the problem or address the upsetting behavior. Be clear about expectations regarding who will do what by when or about which behaviors you need to stop, start, or continue in order for you both to achieve the desired results. Notice that the points above incorporate all four aspects: Initiate Discover, Connect, and Build. It is very, very important that you get the DialogueWORKS framework for holding conversations firmly in your head. You need to practice the framework and the skills that are encompassed by it every day. If you do, you will find that it doesn’t matter if you are “outside” or “inside” the conversation—you will always know what to do and where to go to make your conversations really WORK. |
|
| View Comments |
Managing Your Boss's NegativityMay 27th, 2011 |
|
|
Q: I really liked the last blog you posted in April because that situation has happened to me as well. However, my manager is so negative and defensive that I am afraid if I shared, “I did what you asked me to do,” I would create more defensiveness that would result in increased conflict. What can I do to reduce this person’s negative energy and create a viable solution that will improve results?
|
|
| View Comments |
Don't Blame Me!April 13th, 2011 |
|
|
Give the Benefit of the Doubt
If you have no data for the topic of the meeting, don’t assume that they are going to blame you for the budget overrun. If you approach them from the perspective of defensiveness, you may end up creating defensiveness in them as well. Remember that what begins well usually ends well. Assume positive intent.
On the other hand, let’s assume that they are intending to blame you in the meeting. You will need to have prepared or assembled any instructions or parameters of the project that were communicated to you. Hopefully, you have some form of email or other documentation that was given as instructions for completion of the project, either by management or the client.
Unfortunately, it is not uncommon that others get blamed for doing exactly what they were asked to do. If you think this may happen in the future, then you must always be prepared by doing whatever you may need to do such as having clearly documented instructions and agreed upon guidelines for all the work you do. Having documentation will help you avoid the potential of blame and false accusation in the future.
At no time in the conversation should you offer advice. For example, you wouldn’t want to say, “Well, you could have saved money if you had asked me to…” or “You should have known that the client would have expanded the scope of the project, so you should have just said ‘No!’” Making such statements is blaming them for what they did or didn’t do. This kind of blame is the equivalent of saying, “If you weren’t so stupid, we wouldn’t be in this mess!” Blaming them, even if they are at fault, doesn’t solve anything so just smile and keep it simple.
Take the initiative to ask questions and to identify together issues and responsibilities that would help future projects go more smoothly and come in under budget. Be open to any suggestions that they may offer and clarify anything they have asked you to do differently in the future. You might also put such agreements in an email to manage expectations and to document your agreement. Offer support by asking questions and clarifying future expectations.
If this is a project that is assigned with a shortened deadline, planning efficiently will always be crucial to your success. Going forward be sure that everyone that will be involved in the project has input in creating a concrete, agreed upon plan that can be executed. Although it seems like common sense, it is amazing how easy it is to overlook the involvement of others in the creation of a workable plan. Make a plan to succeed with everyone’s input.
Some individuals think faster than they actually speak. This behavior is the function of their interaction style—the way they think and speak to others. Thinking faster than speaking results in the individual believing that they have communicated their thoughts accurately when the reverse is true. Ask clarifying questions to solidify and identify expectations and don’t be surprised if you hear something that wasn’t communicated originally. Don’t assume anything, but instead ask questions to clarify. |
|
| View Comments |
Throwing ThingsFebruary 24th, 2011 |
|
|
Q: "I am a nurse in the O.R. at a local hospital. At times, out of frustration, certain physicians will throw things at us during surgery—soiled sponges, gauze, and sometimes even instruments. Our hospital has a motto of being 'Physician Friendly,' and yet our greatest asset is our people—all of our people—and the respect that we demonstrate to each other. How do I hold a difficult conversation about this behavior 'on the fly?'"
A: There are really two conversations that need to be held in this situation: a conversation about emotions and an expectations conversation. The Emotional Conversation When someone demonstrates defensive or reactionary behavior, remember that their behavior and emotion say more about them than about you. Behind a behavior like this is a violated expectation or personal value. When surgeons act out in this way, it might be that they are attempting to achieve or “get” something they want. The problem is that this “attacking” behavior usually creates defensiveness in people who are on the receiving end. In an emotional state like this, neither party is thinking rationally. The physician, who is angry, thinks that belittling the nurse will motivate a change in the nurse’s behavior. Wrong! The nurse is probably thinking defensively, having thoughts like these: “What did I do wrong this time?!” or “I wonder if I’ll be able to keep my job.” Whatever they are actually thinking, it is clear that neither party is giving full attention to the patient on the table.
“What did the doctor expect me to do?”
“What do you want me to do?”
“Well you should know!” Ignore these accusations and criticisms, and ask the questions again until you see rationality return and you get a viable answer. Ask, Ask, Ask! The only thing you need to remember “on the fly” is to ask questions that will increase your understanding and thus improve the situation. The Expectations Conversation Once the procedure in the O.R. is over and a patient’s well-being is no longer at stake, it’s time to talk about what happened. For this conversation, you want to spend a few moments thinking and preparing before you engage the physician (which you want to do in private, by the way, and not in front of an audience if possible).
“I’d like to talk about meeting your expectations. Do you have a minute?”
“Obviously, when you threw the sponge at me (Data), I was not meeting your expectations. (Interpretation)”
“Is that true?” Or you can ask questions that increase your learning: “What were your expectations at that time?” Be sure to keep asking and listening until you have a clear understanding of expectations.
“I want to provide excellent care for our patients and extraordinary support for you. And I want to be clear about meeting your expectations. (Expectations)
It is easy to remember to ask questions when you are confronted with emotion and irrationality. It is a bit more difficult to craft a conversation about expectations. Notice that the example we gave above does not even address respect—that would be a separate conversation entirely. When you take a moment to think through the various aspects of any difficult conversation, you will help the conversation go more smoothly, and go further toward achieving your desired results. After all, working to improve the way you work as a team in the O.R. is certainly in everyone’s best interest. |
|
| View Comments |
Why Don't They Do What They Say They'll Do?January 12th, 2011 |
|
|
A: There are a number of reasons why leaders may break a commitment: First, changing priorities often influence one’s ability to keep a commitment within a specific time frame. Second, with all that leaders have to do, it is easy to overlook—or simply forget—some commitments. Or perhaps your manager has changed her mind about having you prepare the report after all. This is a perfect example of a conversation that will reestablish your leader’s commitment and support for an assignment she has made. Here are a few tips to help you hold the conversation effectively:
To summarize: Take a few minutes to prepare how you will hold the conversation by creating an Attention Check, identifying the facts you want to share, and crafting an interpretation that is free of blame or accusation. Then ask questions to increase your understanding. Once you have gained additional necessary insight, reaffirm your commitment to do the work, identify impending consequences, and formulate a plan for success. Taking a moment to think through the phases of the conversation will ensure your success. Good luck, and let us know how it goes! |
|
| View Comments |
Announcing our New Blog!!!October 18th, 2010 |
|
|
This is a test of the blog addition feature. how does it wrk?
|











.png)

Q: “I am in marketing and I design marketing campaigns for major corporations. My boss recently asked me to design a campaign in six weeks that should have taken three months. After completing the project on time, my manager, director, and vice president want to blame me for running over budget. It seems that when they lowered their bid on the campaign, they forgot to reduce the scope of the project. Consequently, we had to meet the client’s demands at a lower price. My supervisors have called a meeting with me next week, and I am guessing they are going to blame me for the budget overrun. What should I say or do?”
Plan to Succeed
Try these tips to restore rationality to the situation.

.jpg)